Re: [Patch 0/9] Per-task delay accounting

On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 07:40:34PM -0500, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
> This is the next iteration of the delay accounting patches
> last posted at
> 	http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0602.3/0893.html

Do you have any benchmark numbers with this patch applied and with it
not applied?  Last I heard it was a measurable decrease for some
"important" benchmark results...

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Patch 0/9] Performance
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 0/9] Per-task delay accounting
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Patch 0/9] Per-task delay accounting
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: question: pid space semantics.
• Next by Date: Re: [git pull] jfs update
• Previous by thread: [Patch 6/9] cpu delay collection
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch 0/9] Per-task delay accounting
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]