Re: [PATCH] task: Make task list manipulations RCU safe.

"Eric W. Biederman" wrote:
> 
> Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Some questions.
> >
> > first_tgid:
> >       ...
> >       for (; pos && pid_alive(pos); pos = next_task(pos))
> >
> > I think this patch makes this 'pid_alive(pos)' unneeded?
> 
> Close.  The problem is that we could have slept with the
> count elevated on start before we do rcu_read_lock().

Yes, we could have slept. But (unlike next_tgid) this loop
starts from pos=init_task or from pos=find_task_by_pid()
and we are doing find_task_by_pid under rcu_read_lock() ?

Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] task: Make task list manipulations RCU safe.
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• References:
  • [PATCH] task: Make task list manipulations RCU safe.
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [PATCH] task: Make task list manipulations RCU safe.
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] task: Make task list manipulations RCU safe.
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] task: Make task list manipulations RCU safe.
• Next by Date: Re: Dmesg is not showing whole boot list
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] task: Make task list manipulations RCU safe.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] task: Make task list manipulations RCU safe.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]