On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 08:29 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > and there are some active methods as well: you might want to try Mike > Galbraith's scheduler throttling feature: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/3/59 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/3/63 > > (which we could try in -mm too perhaps, perhaps Mike has an updated > patch for 2.6.16-rc6-mm1?) Yeah, the whole thing is in the attached tarball. The only significant difference from last posted version is that setting both tunables to 0 causes 100% of the interactivity stuff to be disabled, returning the scheduler to pure O(1), but with it's ability to starve mostly neutered. -Mike (delicate tummy warning may be appropriate.. dunno;)
Attachment:
throttle-V20-2.6.16-rc6-mm1.tar.gz
Description: application/compressed-tar
- References:
- Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- From: j4K3xBl4sT3r <[email protected]>
- Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- From: Grant Coady <[email protected]>
- Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc6-rt1
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Expose input device usages to userspace
- Previous by thread: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- Next by thread: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
- Index(es):
 |