Re: [PATCH] scm: fold __scm_send() into scm_send()

Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:05:31PM +0100, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> > From: Ingo Oeser <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Fold __scm_send() into scm_send() and remove that interface completly
> > from the kernel.
> 
> Whoa, what are you doing here?
>

scm_send() and scm_recv() are already uninlined in Dave's tree - this patch
does further consolidation.

>  Uninlining scm_send() is a Bad Thing to do 
> given that scm_send() is in the AF_UNIX hot path.

scm_send() and scm_recv() are in _two_ AF_UNIX hotpaths...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: + uninline-scm_recv-and-scm_send-fix.patch added to -mm tree
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] scm: fold __scm_send() into scm_send()
    • From: Ingo Oeser <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] scm: fold __scm_send() into scm_send()
    • From: Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 4/7] dm/md dependency tree in sysfs: bd_claim_by_disk
• Next by Date: [PATCH 6/7] dm/md dependency tree in sysfs: dm to use bd_claim_by_disk
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] scm: fold __scm_send() into scm_send()
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] scm: fold __scm_send() into scm_send()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]