In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:44:56 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> VESA does not require VM86 so this change is completely wrong.
What is this all about then?
Begin quote ------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 10 Mar 2006 11:23:18 GMT
From: Kenneth Parrish <[email protected]>
Subject: [2.6.16-rc5-git13] Xorg.log difference
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
i see this difference with 2.6.16-rc5-git13 kernel. more info on request -kp
5c5
< Current Operating System: Linux fret 2.6.16-rc5-git13 #2 Fri Mar 10 10:45:41
2006 i686
---
> Current Operating System: Linux fret 2.6.15.6 #1 Tue Mar 07 13:44:04 2006 i686
13c13
< (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Mar 10 04:49:26 2006
---
> (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Mar 10 05:02:35 2006
327,337c327,383
< (EE) ATI(0): unknown type(0xffffffff)=0xff
< (II) ATI(0): EAX=0x00004f00, EBX=0x00000000, ECX=0x00000000, EDX=0x00000000
< (II) ATI(0): ESP=0x00000ffa, EBP=0x00000000, ESI=0x00000000, EDI=0x00002000
< (II) ATI(0): CS=0xc000, SS=0x0100, DS=0x0040, ES=0x0000, FS=0x0000, GS=0x0000
< (II) ATI(0): EIP=0x00001306, EFLAGS=0x00003200
< (II) ATI(0): code at 0x000c1306:
< fb fc 80 fc a0 0f 84 a6 3c 80 fc 4f 0f 84 c0 2d
< 1e 06 57 56 55 52 51 53 50 50 8a c4 32 e4 d1 e0
< (II) stack at 0x00001ffa:
< 00 06 00 00 00 32
< (II) ATI(0): VESA BIOS not detected
---
> (II) ATI(0): VESA BIOS detected
> (II) ATI(0): VESA VBE Version 2.0
> (II) ATI(0): VESA VBE Total Mem: 4096 kB
> (II) ATI(0): VESA VBE OEM: ATI MACH64
> (II) ATI(0): VESA VBE OEM Software Rev: 1.0
> (II) ATI(0): VESA VBE OEM Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
> (II) ATI(0): VESA VBE OEM Product: MACH64GT
> (II) ATI(0): VESA VBE OEM Product Rev: 01.00
End quote ------------------------------------------------------------------
Begin quote ------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 11 Mar 2006 03:01:00 GMT
From: Kenneth Parrish <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [2.6.16-rc5-git13] Xorg.log difference
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
-=> In article 10 Mar 06 17:20:10, Ingo Oeser wrote to All <=-
yo Ingo :)
[ mach64 rage 3d dual pci+agp1 vbe undetected x11-6.7.0-i586-4 ]
[..]
IO> Did you disable vm86 support, too?
IO> # CONFIG_VM86 is not set
bet that's it - thank ya :)
End quote ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Worse
> still the x86-64 does not support VM86 so you have just crippled the
> x86-64 port unneccessarily.
Huh? I checked my working x86_64 .config and found this:
CONFIG_X86_64=y
CONFIG_64BIT=y
CONFIG_X86=y
...
CONFIG_VM86=y
so I assumed it was OK to force VM86.
--
Chuck
"Penguins don't come from next door, they come from the Antarctic!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
