Hi,
In here, I think the following order is more cache-friendly. What do
you think?
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN fs/fs-writeback.c~iput-before-cond_resched fs/fs-writeback.c
--- linux-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c~iput-before-cond_resched 2006-03-05 21:51:12.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6-hirofumi/fs/fs-writeback.c 2006-03-05 21:51:12.000000000 +0900
@@ -382,8 +382,8 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, s
list_move(&inode->i_list, &sb->s_dirty);
}
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
- cond_resched();
iput(inode);
+ cond_resched();
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)
break;
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
