Re: [PATCH] Define flush_wc, a way to flush write combining store buffers

On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 15:38 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Hmm, I reread the thread and with the "i don't need a flush, just ordering" 
> part of your description it makes sense.

Actually, the sfence architecturally guarantees a WC store buffer flush
on x86_64 too, which I need.  Obviously, on CPUs that don't have WC
on-chip, this is not an issue.

> My second objection still stands though. Maybe we should add this as
> part of a generic portable PAT/WC infrastructure. But isolated
> it doesn't make sense.

Fine.  I'll put it in the driver for now, and work on the generic WC
infrastructure in parallel.

	<b

-- 
Bryan O'Sullivan <[email protected]>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Define flush_wc, a way to flush write combining store buffers
  - From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Define flush_wc, a way to flush write combining store buffers
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Define flush_wc, a way to flush write combining store buffers
  - From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Define flush_wc, a way to flush write combining store buffers
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Document Linux's memory barriers [try #2]
Next by Date: [2.6 patch] add a proper prototype for setup_arch()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Define flush_wc, a way to flush write combining store buffers
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Define flush_wc, a way to flush write combining store buffers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]