On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:39:04PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]>
> Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 17:08:47 +0530
>
> > Great. I look forward to hearing from you about the results
> > with your test case.
>
> It works quite fine so far, I haven't seen the filp exhaustion
> nor a highly fragmented filp SLAB.
Good to hear that.
> Instead, I'm not hitting other bugs that are of my own doing
> on Niagara, which is what I wanted to accomplish with these
> stress tests in the first place :-)
Not good :)
> I think we should seriously consider these patches for 2.6.16
Isn't it a little too late in the 2.6.16 cycle ? I would have
liked a little more time in -mm. Anyway, it is Linus' call.
I can refresh the patches and submit against latest mainline
if Linus and Andrew want.
Thanks
Dipankar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
