Re: PROBLEM: rt_sigsuspend() does not return EINTR on 2.6.16-rc2+

Matthew Grant <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> OK, a major piece of software is broken for mounting removable media. A
>  kernel upgrade from 2.6.15 SHOULDn't do that.  

Yes, this is a serious problem and we need to get to the bottom of it.

Could you please describe, in super-simple steps, how one should go about
reproducing it?

Also, the entire strace output for both good and bad kernels might be
useful.  Am wondering what your fd #4 refers to.

A socket, I guess.  It _might_ not be a signal or poll problem at all (but
it probably is, given the track record of those patches).

Do you have time to do a git-bisect?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: PROBLEM: rt_sigsuspend() does not return EINTR on 2.6.16-rc2+
    • From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>

• References:
  • PROBLEM: rt_sigsuspend() does not return EINTR on 2.6.16-rc2+
    • From: Matthew Grant <[email protected]>
  • Re: PROBLEM: rt_sigsuspend() does not return EINTR on 2.6.16-rc2+
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: PROBLEM: rt_sigsuspend() does not return EINTR on 2.6.16-rc2+
    • From: Matthew Grant <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
• Next by Date: Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of Linux
• Previous by thread: Re: PROBLEM: rt_sigsuspend() does not return EINTR on 2.6.16-rc2+
• Next by thread: Re: PROBLEM: rt_sigsuspend() does not return EINTR on 2.6.16-rc2+
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]