Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let NET_CLS_ACT no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This option should IMHO no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> 
> This patch was already sent on:
> - 12 Feb 2006

Yesterday I managed to crash my machine playing around with tc actions
within minutes. I haven't looked into it yet, but it seems it still
needs more testing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let NET_CLS_ACT no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL
    • From: jamal <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC: 2.6 patch] let NET_CLS_ACT no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] simplify update_times (avoid jiffies/jiffies_64 aliasing problem)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/13] RTC Subsystem, library functions
• Previous by thread: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let NET_CLS_ACT no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let NET_CLS_ACT no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]