Re: [PATCH 0/8] Intel I/O Acceleration Technology (I/OAT)

Chris Leech wrote:

Patch #2 didn't make it.  Too big for the list?

Could be, it's the largest of the series.  I've attached the gziped
patch.  I can try and split this up for the future.

Well, for huge hunks of new code, it sometimes gets silly to split it up.

Once its not in a "reply to email" reviewable form, gzip or URL-to-patch work just fine.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/8] Intel I/O Acceleration Technology (I/OAT)
    • From: Chris Leech <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/8] Intel I/O Acceleration Technology (I/OAT)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/8] Intel I/O Acceleration Technology (I/OAT)
    • From: "Chris Leech" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
• Next by Date: Re: proper way to assign fixed PCI resources to a "hotplug" device
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Intel I/O Acceleration Technology (I/OAT)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Intel I/O Acceleration Technology (I/OAT)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]