Re: Another compile problem with on AMD64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 3/2/06, Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 March 2006 19:16, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Andi, Christoph : would this make sense as a fix for -stable ?
> It's already fixed in stable.

Hmm, ok, so it's in the queue for (since it obviously isn't
in current -stable as that's where Steffen hit it), that's

> > How about mainline ?
> mainline never had this problem. The backport was just bad.

Hmm, I see that at least two things from the patch seems to be
aplicable to at least current -mm (haven't checked latest Linus -git
The bit that removes BITS_PER_BYTE from
arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_cat.c and the bit that removes the
duplicate #include <linux/mempolicy.h> and substitutes it with
#include <linux/types.h>  those bits would seem to apply to

include/linux/types.h already has the BITSPER_BYTE define in -mm.

Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post
Plain text mails only, please
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux