On 3/2/06, Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 March 2006 19:16, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Andi, Christoph : would this make sense as a fix for -stable ?
> It's already fixed in stable.
Hmm, ok, so it's in the queue for 126.96.36.199 (since it obviously isn't
in current 188.8.131.52 -stable as that's where Steffen hit it), that's
> > How about mainline ?
> mainline never had this problem. The backport was just bad.
Hmm, I see that at least two things from the patch seems to be
aplicable to at least current -mm (haven't checked latest Linus -git
The bit that removes BITS_PER_BYTE from
arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_cat.c and the bit that removes the
duplicate #include <linux/mempolicy.h> and substitutes it with
#include <linux/types.h> those bits would seem to apply to
include/linux/types.h already has the BITSPER_BYTE define in -mm.
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]