>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of bibo mao
>>Sent: 2006年3月1日 14:23
>>To: [email protected]
>>Cc: Mao, Bibo; Andrew Morton; [email protected]; Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli; Keshavamurthy, Anil S;
>>[email protected]
>>Subject: Re: [PATCH]kprobe handler discard user space trap
>>
>>This patch removes code in kprobe_handler() function which calculates
>>user space int3 trap address in i386 architecture. And this patch is
>>based on kprobe-handler-discard-user-space-trap.patch, against
>>2.6.16-rc5-mm1.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: bibo mao <[email protected]>
>>
>>--- a/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c 2006-03-01 12:48:54.000000000 +0800
>>+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c 2006-03-01 14:08:12.000000000 +0800
>>@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static int __kprobes kprobe_handler(stru
>> {
>> struct kprobe *p;
>> int ret = 0;
>>- kprobe_opcode_t *addr = NULL;
>>+ kprobe_opcode_t *addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)(regs->eip -
>>sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
>> unsigned long *lp;
>> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
>>@@ -217,17 +217,6 @@ static int __kprobes kprobe_handler(stru
>> preempt_disable();
>> kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>>
>>- /* Check if the application is using LDT entry for its code segment and
>>- * calculate the address by reading the base address from the LDT entry.
>>- */
>>- if ((regs->xcs & 4) && (current->mm)) {
>>- lp = (unsigned long *) ((unsigned long)((regs->xcs >> 3) * 8)
>>- + (char *) current->mm->context.ldt);
>>- addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *) (get_desc_base(lp) + regs->eip -
>>- sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
>>- } else {
>>- addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)(regs->eip - sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
>>- }
>> /* Check we're not actually recursing */
>> if (kprobe_running()) {
>> p = get_kprobe(addr);
>>
>>Prasanna S Panchamukhi wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 03:23:12PM +0800, bibo,mao wrote:
>>>> Currently kprobe handler traps only happen in kernel space, so function
>>>> kprobe_exceptions_notify should skip traps which happen in user space.
>>>> This patch modifies this, and it is based on 2.6.16-rc4.
>>>
>>> You need to remove the code which calculates the
>>> user space address in kprobe_handler() and also you need
>>> to remove the code that checks for VM86 in i386, since
>>> your patch check if user/vm86 at the top level.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Prasanna
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: bibo mao <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> diff -Nruap a/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c
>>>> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c 2006-02-25 17:08:52.000000000 +0800
>>>> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c 2006-03-01 10:37:50.000000000 +0800
>>>> @@ -463,6 +463,9 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_exceptions_notify(s
>>>> struct die_args *args = (struct die_args *)data;
>>>> int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>>
>>>> + if (user_mode(args->regs))
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> switch (val) {
>>>> case DIE_INT3:
>>>> if (kprobe_handler(args->regs))
>>>> diff -Nruap a/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c
>>>> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c 2006-02-25 17:08:53.000000000 +0800
>>>> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c 2006-03-01 10:39:15.000000000 +0800
>>>> @@ -740,6 +740,9 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_exceptions_notify(s
>>>> struct die_args *args = (struct die_args *)data;
>>>> int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>>
>>>> + if (user_mode(args->regs))
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> switch(val) {
>>>> case DIE_BREAK:
>>>> /* err is break number from ia64_bad_break() */
>>>> diff -Nruap a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c 2006-02-25 17:08:52.000000000 +0800
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c 2006-03-01 10:39:53.000000000 +0800
>>>> @@ -397,6 +397,9 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_exceptions_notify(s
>>>> struct die_args *args = (struct die_args *)data;
>>>> int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>>
>>>> + if (user_mode(args->regs))
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> switch (val) {
>>>> case DIE_BPT:
>>>> if (kprobe_handler(args->regs))
>>>> diff -Nruap a/arch/sparc64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/sparc64/kernel/kprobes.c
>>>> --- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/kprobes.c 2006-02-25 17:08:52.000000000 +0800
>>>> +++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/kprobes.c 2006-03-01 10:40:16.000000000 +0800
>>>> @@ -324,6 +324,9 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_exceptions_notify(s
>>>> struct die_args *args = (struct die_args *)data;
>>>> int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>>
>>>> + if (user_mode(args->regs))
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> switch (val) {
>>>> case DIE_DEBUG:
>>>> if (kprobe_handler(args->regs))
>>>> diff -Nruap a/arch/x86_64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/kprobes.c
>>>> --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/kprobes.c 2006-02-25 17:08:52.000000000 +0800
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/kprobes.c 2006-03-01 10:38:48.000000000 +0800
>>>> @@ -601,6 +601,9 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_exceptions_notify(s
>>>> struct die_args *args = (struct die_args *)data;
>>>> int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>>
>>>> + if (user_mode(args->regs))
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> switch (val) {
>>>> case DIE_INT3:
>>>> if (kprobe_handler(args->regs))
>>>
When my ia64 box reboots with kernel 2.6.16-rc5-mm1, kernel hanged in kprobe_exceptions_notify.
args->regs doesn't always point to a valid address. It might be NULL. machine_restart calls notify_die
with parameter regs=NULL. Pls. check args->regs before using user_mode.
Pls. also check if other archs have the same problem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
