Re: [PATCH] Fix powerpc bad_page_fault output (Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1)

 
> Right. The new printk's were added recently, and I took the KERN_ALERT
> level from the x86 code then without double-checking what die() uses. I
> guess I could move the die() output over instead, or move them both to
> KERN_ERR.

I just noticed x86 can now pass the log level around via
show_trace_log_lvl and show_stack_log_lvl. Something we might want to
add so we can KERN_EMERG the whole oops.

Anton
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • 2.6.16-rc5-mm1
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1
    • From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] Fix powerpc bad_page_fault output (Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1)
    • From: Olof Johansson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix powerpc bad_page_fault output (Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1)
    • From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix powerpc bad_page_fault output (Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1)
    • From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix powerpc bad_page_fault output (Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1)
    • From: Olof Johansson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Fixes for NFS file truncation race condition(s)
• Next by Date: RE: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix powerpc bad_page_fault output (Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix powerpc bad_page_fault output (Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]