Re: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU.

On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 04:24:41AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:

 > > Why ACPI decides to create 3 processor entries is still odd though.
 > 
 > It should be four.

Then I guess the ACPI guys have an off-by-one bug somewhere ;)

		Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU.
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU.
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU.
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU.
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: page allocation failure when cached memory is close to the total memory.
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU.
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU.
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]