On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:58:02PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: > Greg wrote: > > As reported this is expected, and can be ignored safely. It's just scsi > > being bad :) > > Yeah - so I eventually realized. > > > > [<a0000001001eac90>] sysfs_create_group+0x30/0x2a0 > > > sp=e00002343bd97d50 bsp=e00002343bd91120 > > > [<a000000100809190>] topology_cpu_callback+0x70/0xc0 > > > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910f0 > > > [<a000000100809260>] topology_sysfs_init+0x80/0x120 > > > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910d0 > > > > This points at the sysfs cpu patches that are in -mm, which are not in > > my tree... > > So ... what does that mean for who should be looking at this? Hm, looks like that stuff went into mainline already, sorry I thought it was still in -mm. Look at changeset 69dcc99199fe29b0a29471a3488d39d9d33b25fc for details. I've cced Yanmin, who did that work. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
- Next by Date: Re: MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE
- Previous by thread: Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- Next by thread: Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
- Index(es):
 |