Re: OOM-killer too aggressive?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:30:02PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Isnt this also a constrained allocation? We could expand the check to also 
> > > catch these types of restrictions and fail.
> > 
> > No, it uses the full fallback zone list of the target node, not a custom
> > one. Would be hard to detect without a flag.

Right but it specifies in its flags that not all system memory can satisfy 
this particular memory request. That fact may be detected by the 
out_of_memory() function. We could do something special there instead of 
OOMing.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux