Re: [PATCH 01/02] cpuset memory spread slab cache filesys

On Monday 27 February 2006 23:14, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > On Monday 27 February 2006 21:56, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > We could make the memory policy only apply if the SLAB_MEM_SPREAD option 
> > Which memory policy? The one of the process?
> 
> Yes.

I don't quite get your logic here. For me it would be logical to apply
the memory policy from the process for anything _but_ slab caches
that have SLAB_MEM_SPREAD set. For those interleaving should be always used.

Why are you proposing to do it the other way round?

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 01/02] cpuset memory spread slab cache filesys
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 01/02] cpuset memory spread slab cache filesys
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 01/02] cpuset memory spread slab cache filesys
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 01/02] cpuset memory spread slab cache filesys
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [patch 33/39] [PATCH] x86_64: Check for bad elf entry address
• Next by Date: [PATCH -rt] Split PREEMPT_RCU implementation into separate rcupreempt.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/02] cpuset memory spread slab cache filesys
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/02] cpuset memory spread slab cache filesys
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]