Re: [patch 10/39] [PATCH] i386/x86-64: Dont IPI to offline cpus on shutdown

On Monday 27 February 2006 23:32, Chris Wright wrote:
> -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> ------------------
> 
> So why are we calling smp_send_stop from machine_halt?

I don't think that one is really suitable for stable since it's
a relative obscure problem and the fix is not fully clear. Also it might
have side effects. Shouldn't be merged.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 10/39] [PATCH] i386/x86-64: Dont IPI to offline cpus on shutdown
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 00/39]
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • [patch 10/39] [PATCH] i386/x86-64: Dont IPI to offline cpus on shutdown
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: AMD64 X2 lost ticks on PM timer
• Next by Date: Re: [Patch 5/7] synchronous block I/O delays
• Previous by thread: [patch 10/39] [PATCH] i386/x86-64: Dont IPI to offline cpus on shutdown
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 10/39] [PATCH] i386/x86-64: Dont IPI to offline cpus on shutdown
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]