On Sunday 26 February 2006 23:31, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> On Sunday 26 February 2006 19:13, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> > Ok, I did some reading and just started a git bisect. I didn't find hints
> > on how to bisect if I'm only interested in changes to sky2.[ch], so I'm
> > taking the full kernel tree and skip testing those bisect steps that
> > didn't change sky2.[ch].
> >
> > Looking at Carl-Daniels 0.13a and Stephens patch against 0.15 in this
> > thread, I'll patch each bisect step such that sky2_poll() has
> >
> > sky2_write32(hw, STAT_CTRL, SC_STAT_CLR_IRQ);
> > if (sky2_read8(hw, STAT_LEV_TIMER_CTRL) == TIM_START) {
> > sky2_write8(hw, STAT_LEV_TIMER_CTRL, TIM_STOP);
> > sky2_write8(hw, STAT_LEV_TIMER_CTRL, TIM_START);
> > }
> >
> > after exit_loop. Is that ok?
> >
> > I'll report as soon as I have results.
>
> Bisect done:
>
> 4d52b48b43d0d1d5959fa722ee0046e3542e5e1b is first bad commit
> [PATCH] sky2: support msi interrupt (revised)
>
> Reverting this commit in git head seems to work, at least the driver builds
> and loads. Is that sane?
>
> I'm currently testing this (without any further modifications), let's see
> if it hangs or not.
Ok, no hangs yet.
This version passed a test scenario only 0.13a has survived so far. I'll
continue to use this to give it more testing tomorrow.
Looking at the reverted commit, I wonder if modprobing sky2 with disable_msi=1
is equivalent to reverting the commit?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
