Re: 2.6.16-rc4-mm2: drivers/rtc/utils.c should become part of a generic implementation

On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:10:25 +0100
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Sounds good, but for generic functions, two adjustments are required:
> - move the code to lib/
> - remove rtc_ prefixes from the functions

 Moved. I'm not sure about renaming them.. 

 the functions are:

rtc_month_days
rtc_time_to_tm
rtc_valid_tm
rtc_tm_to_time

 I think they make more sense with the rtc prefix

-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4-mm2: drivers/rtc/utils.c should become part of a generic implementation
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

References:
- 2.6.16-rc4-mm2
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.16-rc4-mm2: drivers/rtc/utils.c should become part of a generic implementation
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4-mm2: drivers/rtc/utils.c should become part of a generic implementation
  - From: Alessandro Zummo <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4-mm2: drivers/rtc/utils.c should become part of a generic implementation
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: OOM-killer too aggressive?
Next by Date: Re: hda: irq timeout: status=0xd0 DMA question
Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc4-mm2: drivers/rtc/utils.c should become part of a generic implementation
Next by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc4-mm2: drivers/rtc/utils.c should become part of a generic implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]