Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool

El Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:13:08 -0800,
Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]> escribió:

> Why? You can build unix domain sockets as a loadable module and
> it runs fine (or it did last I tried). Whether that makes sense from a 

I've been running with CONFIG_UNIX=m since the dawn of time and everything
seems to work - not that I care if it's disabled, I just wanted to
confirm that it works.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] silence gcc warning about possibly uninitialized use of variable in scsi_scan
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]