On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 18:05 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote: > Pavel, if you mean that the userspace code will not be reviewed to > standards the kernel code is, kill uswsusp _NOW_ before it does too > much damage. Unreliable suspend eats filesystems for breakfast. The > other userspace components of the kernels services are either optional > (udev) or not that important (alsa). > Why is sound less important than suspending, or networking, or any other subsystem? This is an insult to everyone who worked long and hard to get decent sound support on Linux. This attitude is why many distro's sound support is godawful. Sometimes I suspect they are testing on machines without speakers connected. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]
- From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Prev by Date: Re: make -j with j <= 4 seems to only load a single CPU core
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/6] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take2) - Add device_flags into pci_device_id
- Previous by thread: Re: suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]
- Next by thread: Re: suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]
- Index(es):
 |