Re: Suppressing softrepeat

On 2/21/06, Vojtech Pavlik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure where this would help. The problem is that the DRAC3
> 'holds' the key pressed for full 500 ms before sending the release
> scancde, even if the user pressed it just momentarily. It doesn't
> generate repeat scancodes in this time. This however triggers the
> softrepeat, which is by default set to 250 ms, causing repeated
> characters all the time.
>

Ah, I see. Well, then we really can't help it without fiddling with repeat rate.

--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Suppressing softrepeat
    • From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
  • Re: Suppressing softrepeat
    • From: Vojtech Pavlik <[email protected]>
  • Re: Suppressing softrepeat
    • From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Suppressing softrepeat
    • From: Vojtech Pavlik <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/6] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take2) - Add device_flags into pci_device_id
• Next by Date: Re: make -j with j <= 4 seems to only load a single CPU core
• Previous by thread: Re: Suppressing softrepeat
• Next by thread: Re: Suppressing softrepeat
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]