> Pavel Machek <[email protected]> writes: > > >> Ah, and now the part I really like, some hard numbers: > >> swsusp takes between 26 and 30 seconds to suspend (in my four tries: 26, > >> 30, 28, 26) and between 35 and 45 seconds to resume (35, 45, 39, 37). > >> > >> Suspend 2 does suspend in around 14-16 seconds, and resume in 18 to 21. > >> > >> That is factor 2! > > > > Does that include time to boot resume kernel? It will not be that > > dramatic with that time included, and it is only fair to include > > it. Anyway uswsusp solves that issue. > > On my old ThinkPad, the difference is more like a factor of 3 to 4 - > from the moment I press the power button until X is up and running. Well, yep, it really depends on CPU/harddisk. Can you try code from suspend.sf.net? It should be as fast as suspend2. Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which is simpler?
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler?
- References:
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler?
- From: Harald Arnesen <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Prev by Date: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Next by Date: Re: (pspace,pid) vs true pid virtualization
- Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler?
- Next by thread: Re: Which is simpler?
- Index(es):
 |