On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 13:48 -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
> True, that would work. It would require the addition of another mount
> option though, so I wonder, is that really needed? What problem with
> the current patch would this solve? Is there really a need to save real
> ids to the disk with the current uid option and no force? Keep in mind
> that udf is meant for removable media where the uids aren't going to
> make any sense in another system.
Yeah, but even for removable media proper uid/gid makes sense. For
instance, if I am sharing an usb stick with someone else on the same
computer, uid/gid is useful. Anyway, I prefer that force thing and if
everyone else disagrees with me, now would be a good time to say so.
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
