Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 at 20:21:08 +0000, Paulo Marques wrote:
+ regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
+ tsk->ptrace &= ~PT_DTRACE;
+ if (!tsk->ptrace & PT_DTRACE)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Looks like this is always true because that bit was cleared one line above.
Maybe it should be testing PT_DTRACED instead? And it's missing parens too,
so try:
if (!(tsk->ptrace & PT_DTRACED))
Yes, this does look funny :P
However, this is the piece of code that I don't put in in order to make
the debugger work, and it doesn't exist on the vanilla 2.6.16-rc kernel
anymore.
What I did try to do was to add the:
- if ((tsk->ptrace & (PT_DTRACE|PT_PTRACED)) == PT_DTRACE)
- goto clear_TF;
condition to the 2.6.16-rc kernel, but that didn't work anyway :(
--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com
Pointy-Haired Boss: I don't see anything that could stand in our way.
Dilbert: Sanity? Reality? The laws of physics?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
