Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter

>> >Do you have a better proposal for naming the interfaces?
>>
>> chownfn maybe. (fd + name)
>
>I am not shure if this would match the rules from the Opengroup.
>Solaris has these interfaces since at least 5 years.
>
This is not the cdrecord thread so Solaris is a no-go in this very one.



Thank you,
Jan Engelhardt
-- 
| Software Engineer and Linux/Unix Network Administrator
| Alphagate Systems, http://alphagate.hopto.org/
| jengelh's site, http://jengelh.hopto.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
    • From: Joerg Schilling <[email protected]>
  • Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
    • From: Joerg Schilling <[email protected]>
  • Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
    • From: Joerg Schilling <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
• Next by Date: [PATCH] x86_64 Early initialization of cpu_to_node
• Previous by thread: Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
• Next by thread: Re: The naming of at()s is a difficult matter
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]