Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] add a CPU resource controller

On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:55:29AM +0900, KUROSAWA Takahiro wrote:
> Ah, you are right.  LHS is on per-cpu scale.
> I'll apply your patch.

Great! I also feel that "guarantee" can be explained better (in your first 
documentation patch), especially in the context of multi-cpu systems. Initially 
I was confused what guarantee means in SMP.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/2] CKRM CPU resource controller
    • From: KUROSAWA Takahiro <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 1/2] add a CPU resource controller
    • From: KUROSAWA Takahiro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] add a CPU resource controller
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] add a CPU resource controller
    • From: KUROSAWA Takahiro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [patch] RTC_ALM_SET ioctl secured
• Next by Date: Re: [BUG -rt] -rt16 hang w/ realtime thread test
• Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] add a CPU resource controller
• Next by thread: [PATCH] early_printk: cleanup trailiing whitespace
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]