On Friday 10 February 2006 08:03, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "D. Hazelton" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > And does cdrecord even need libscg anymore? From having actually gone
> > through your code, Joerg, I can tell you that it does serve a larger
> > purpose. But at this point I have to ask - besides cdrecord and a few
> > other _COMPACT_ _DISC_ writing programs, does _ANYONE_ use libscg? Is it
> > ever used to access any other devices that are either SCSI or use a SCSI
> > command protocol (like ATAPI)? My point there is that you have a
> > wonderful library, but despite your wishes, there is no proof that it is
> > ever used for anything except writing/ripping CD's.
>
> Name a single program (not using libscg) that implements user space SCSI
> and runs on as many platforms as cdrecord/libscg does.
I'm not the maintainer of a program, and hence I don't have to.
But why in the hell do you even _need_ SCSI in userspace when the kernel
provides complete facilities? And even then your argument is specious, since
when I did go through the code for libscg all it provided was a simple
wrapper around those kernel facilities for as many OS's as had them. And for
the OS's that didn't have it, then you implemented what you could. You really
need to stop with the finger pointing and accept that you have a problem in
your philosophy.
DRH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
