Sam Vilain wrote: > Kyle Moffett wrote: >> <wishful thinking> >> I can see another extension to this functionality. With appropriate >> changes it might also be possible to have a container exist across >> multiple computers using some cluster code for synchronization and >> fencing. The outermost container would be the system boot container, >> and multiple inner containers would use some sort of network- >> container-aware cluster filesystem to spread multiple vservers across >> multiple servers, distributing CPU and network load appropriately. >> </wishful thinking> > > Yeah. If you fudged/virtualised /dev/random, the system clock, etc you > could even have Tandem-style transparent High Availability. > </more wishful thinking> Could you please explain, why you want to virtualize /dev/random? Tnank you, Vasily Averin Virtuozzo Linux Kernel Team - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- swsusp done by migration (was Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: swsusp done by migration (was Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup)
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: swsusp done by migration (was Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup)
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: swsusp done by migration (was Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup)
- From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup
- Prev by Date: Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown
- Previous by thread: Re: swsusp done by migration (was Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup)
- Next by thread: Re: [Devel] Re: swsusp done by migration (was Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup)
- Index(es):
 |