Re: [PATCH] Complain if driver reenables interrupts during drivers_[suspend|resume] & re-disable

On Tuesday 07 February 2006 04:06, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi all.
> 
> This patch is designed to help with diagnosing and fixing the cause of
> problems in suspending/resuming, due to drivers wrongly re-enabling
> interrupts in their .suspend or .resume methods. 
> 
> I nearly forgot about it in sending patches in suspend2 that might help
> where swsusp fails.
> 

Only sysdevs are guaranteed to be suspebded/resumed with interrupts off,
other devices are suspended with interrupts on (at least on first pass
over device list).

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Complain if driver reenables interrupts during drivers_[suspend|resume] & re-disable
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Complain if driver reenables interrupts during drivers_[suspend|resume] & re-disable
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Complain if driver reenables interrupts during drivers_[suspend|resume] & re-disable
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [1/25] generic funcs
• Next by Date: [PATCH] powerpc: Thermal control for dual core G5s
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Complain if driver reenables interrupts during drivers_[suspend|resume] & re-disable
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Complain if driver reenables interrupts during drivers_[suspend|resume] & re-disable
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]