Re: [PATCH 1/3] NEW VERSION: *at syscalls: Implementation

Tony Luck wrote:
> But I still can't get sys_mkdirat()
> to make a directory ... I just get a regular file.

Does normal mkdir() work?  If yes, it a problem in the way you wire the
syscalls up.  sys_mkdir is just calling sys_mkdirat.

Anyway, hold off on submitting code for the *at syscalls for a bit
longer.  I just found another problem.  Not a bug, but we must expose
the stat64 data instead of stat on 32bit platforms.  I completely missed
this in my patch.  The kernel's stat-related code is in almost a bad of
a shape as glibc's.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] NEW VERSION: *at syscalls: Implementation
    • From: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] NEW VERSION: *at syscalls: Implementation
    • From: Tony Luck <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] stop ==== emergency
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Prevent spinlock debug from timing out too early
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] NEW VERSION: *at syscalls: Implementation
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] NEW VERSION: *at syscalls: Implementation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]