On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 10:41 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Ah, sorry about that, I forgot to verify the NUMA case. The problem is
> that to kmalloc_node() is calling cache_alloc() now which is forced
> inline. I am wondering, would it be ok to make __cache_alloc()
> non-inline for NUMA? The relevant numbers are:
[snip]
Btw, we can also change kmalloc_node() to use kmem_cache_alloc_node()
again but for that, we have a minor correctness issue, namely, the
__builtin_return_address(0) won't work for kmalloc_node(). Hmm.
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
