Re: [PATCH] ufs: fill i_size at directory creation

On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 04:18:15AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> How about this as a first small step?
> +	inode->i_size = UFS_SB(sb)->s_uspi->s_fsize;

It looks very strange for me.

During "fill super" we set block size of device to fragment size,
so sb->s_blocksize and UFS_SB(sb)->s_uspi->s_fsize should be the 
same size on your system: 2048, hence question:
what difference between your and my patch?

-- 
/Evgeniy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Mark CONFIG_UFS_FS_WRITE as BROKEN
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
  • Re [2]: [PATCH] Mark CONFIG_UFS_FS_WRITE as BROKEN
    • From: Evgeniy Dushistov <[email protected]>
  • Re: Re [2]: [PATCH] Mark CONFIG_UFS_FS_WRITE as BROKEN
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] ufs: fill i_size at directory creation
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ibmasm driver: don't use previously freed pointer
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] liyitec: Liyitec PS/2 touchscreen driver
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] ufs: fill i_size at directory creation
• Next by thread: [PATCH] RCU documentation fixes (January 2006 update)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]