Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Olivier Galibert wrote:
No, it isn't.  OTOH, udev maintains it, so I guess that's good enough.
It makes udev the kernel interface though.  I hope they now care about
compatibility (/dev/.udev.pdb vs. /dev/.udev/db/* anyone?).


Yes, it is, where do you think udev gets it's information from? That's right, from /sys. Sysfs is the kernel interface, not udev; the 'u' in udev is for 'user', as in NOT part of the kernel.


Bullshit.  If <x> is the only interface available to a kernel service,
then <x> is part of the kernel whether you like it or not.  Case in
point, the ALSA library.

Bullshit yourself. If cdrecord is the only application for burning cds, that does not make it the kernel interface for cds, and certainly does not make it part of the kernel. The kernel interface is the point of interaction between user and kernel code, which is sysfs.

Udev and HAL are two user mode ( NOT parts of the kernel ) components built to put the information from sysfs to use in user space, and other applications are encouraged to utilize the services those daemons provide. By no stretch of the imagination does that make them part of the kernel.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux