Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api

On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 13:52 +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> How can you migrate application which consists of two processes doing 
> IPC via signals? They are not tired inside kernel anyhow and there is
> no way to automatically detect that both should be migrated together.
> VPSs what provides you such kind of boundaries of what should be 
> considered as a whole.

Could you explain a little bit _how_ VPSs provide this?

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RFC [patch 00/34] PID Virtualization Overview
    • From: Serge Hallyn <[email protected]>
  • RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: Serge Hallyn <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: Hubertus Franke <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: FYI: RAID5 unusably unstable through 2.6.14
• Next by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
• Previous by thread: Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
• Next by thread: Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]