Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:43:06AM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>
>>xquad_portio fix declaration missmatch
>
>
>> arch/i386/boot/compressed/misc.c:125: error: static declaration of
>> 'xquad_portio' follows non-static declaration
>> include/asm/io.h:315: error: previous declaration of 'xquad_portio' was here
>
>
>>--- reference/arch/i386/boot/compressed/misc.c
>>+++ current/arch/i386/boot/compressed/misc.c
>>@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static int vidport;
>> static int lines, cols;
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
>>-static void * xquad_portio = NULL;
>>+void * xquad_portio = NULL;
>> #endif
>
>
> Can you explain why it should stay in misc.c?
Indeed it does feel like it should be a numaq special in the numaq
specific files. I'll spin that and test it and see if there is a reason
why its _not_ like that already.
-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
