Re: GPL V3 and Linux - Dead Copyright Holders

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lee Revell wrote:

What nvidia is doing is already illegal under the GPLv2.

I don't think that's been legally proven.

The question is whether it is a derivative work. If their driver core (aka the binary blob) is common to all their drivers (across multiple OS's), it could be argued that the binary blob itself is not a derivative work. One could almost view it as firmware.

If they ship the binary blob as well as code that interfaces the binary blob with the kernel, and the end-user compiles the code together and loads it into the kernel, does that necessarily violate the GPL?

Chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux