Joerg Schilling schrieb am 2006-02-02:
> Jim Crilly <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Every other method to access those devices uses the device name, i.e.
> > mount, fsck, etc, so why should cdrecord be different?
>
> inadequateness on Linux did force libscg to go this way.
>
> The current method used by libscg is well established since 10 years.
>
> Now Linux likes to confuse people by trying to enforce a completely
> incompatible access method.
>
> Note that I need to avoid unneeded efforts and for this reason, I need to wait
> 5 years until is is forseable that a recent incompatible change in Linux will
> survive long enough to spent time on it.
It is incompatible? Looks like the code is already implemented and ATA:
is in the regular device name space (where RSCSI and the other options
reside as well).
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
