Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency

From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:48:24 +1100

> You might also want to look at multicast but I don't know of any good
> tests for that.

David Stevens at IBM might have some tests.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
    • From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
  • Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
    • From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: DEVICE POLLING
• Next by Date: Re: [x86_64] bttv: linux 2.6.16-rc1 mplayer fails to record ALSA audio and fails tune TV.
• Previous by thread: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
• Next by thread: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]