Re: [ 01/10] [Suspend2] kernel/power/modules.h

On Wednesday 01 February 2006 23:01, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > I think we can call these suspend_{get|set}_modules instead i.e.
> > without the extra '2'.

On 2/1/06, Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wanted to avoid confusion with similar routine names Pavel might use. For
> example, he has a resume_setup and I have a resume2_setup.

Is that necessary for the mainline, though? We have only one suspend
in the kernel, not "Pavel suspend" and "Nigel suspend", right?

                                        Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ 01/10] [Suspend2] kernel/power/modules.h
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ 01/10] [Suspend2] kernel/power/modules.h
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ 01/10] [Suspend2] kernel/power/modules.h
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ 01/10] [Suspend2] kernel/power/modules.h
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ 01/10] [Suspend2] kernel/power/modules.h
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH 1/12] generic *_bit()
• Next by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
• Previous by thread: Re: [ 01/10] [Suspend2] kernel/power/modules.h
• Next by thread: Re: [ 01/10] [Suspend2] kernel/power/modules.h
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]