Pavel Machek <[email protected]> writes:
> Hi!
>
>> >> 7ed8301463a49ad03f8c9de2bbf8c41a5d9843ea
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/keyboard.c b/drivers/char/keyboard.c
>> >> index 8b603b2..4e1f2e0 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/char/keyboard.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/char/keyboard.c
>> >> @@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ struct kbd_struct kbd_table[MAX_NR_CONSO
>> >> static struct kbd_struct *kbd = kbd_table;
>> >> static struct kbd_struct kbd0;
>> >>
>> >> -int spawnpid, spawnsig;
>> >> +TASK_REF(spawnpid);
>> >
>> > Could we get some nicer syntax of declaration? This does not look like
>> > declaration, and looks ugly to my eyes.
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Does
>> struct task_ref *spawnpid = &init_tref;
>
> Looks must better...
The challenge for me is that I make assumptions that a struct task_ref *
always points to something valid.
Maybe it is sufficient to spell that out in comments. Having a helper
function though feels like it encourages it even more. I guess
the code oopsing if it is a NULL pointer helps too.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
