On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:49:41AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 30 January 2006 10:44, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > This patch:
> >
> > - creates asm-generic/swiotlb.h
> > - makes it use 'enum dma_data_direction dir' rather than 'int dir'
> > - updates x86-64 and IA64 to use the common swiotlb.h
> > - fixes the resulting fall out (s/int dir/enum dma_data_direction dir/
> > all over the place).
>
> Al Viro will likely flame you badly for that enum change. Apparently it
> causes some trouble in sparse. Frankly i don't see the point neither.
> It just makes the code harder to read and creates a monstrosity of a patch
> and doesn't give you anything.
DMA-API.txt uses the enum form; so do arm, frv, mips, parisc and
powerpc. x86-64, IA64, alpha, sparc, sparc64 and v850 use the int
form. I really couldn't care less whether we use an enum or an int for
the DMA data direction in the DMA API, as long as all archs used the
same thing. I don't feel comfortable putting swiotlb.h in generic code
unless it really is generic. So... which should it be?
Cheers,
Muli
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
