Re: Fixing make mandocs

hoi :)

On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 08:53:49PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > > > Here would be a good janitor task for 2.6.16. make mandocs
> > > > currently doesn't build because a number of descriptions are
> > > > missing parameters etc.  It would be good if someone could fix
> > > > that and submit patches for 2.6.16.

the thing that really breaks the build is the new __copy_to_user
prototype which kernel-doc could not understand.
This is fixed in my tree.

> > Ok good. Are they going into 2.6.16?

I'll try to get at least the one kernel-doc fix into 2.6.16.

-- 
Martin Waitz

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Fixing make mandocs
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Fixing make mandocs
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fixing make mandocs
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fixing make mandocs
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Fixing make mandocs
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Alsa-devel] RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
• Next by Date: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
• Previous by thread: Re: Fixing make mandocs
• Next by thread: Re: Fixing make mandocs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]