Re: [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec

On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 02:19 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >    Cc: George Anzinger <[email protected]>
> >  From: George Anzinger <[email protected]>
> 
> How many email addresses does the man have, and which is preferred?

Sorry, my bad. I copied the wrong one into the cc-list

<[email protected]> is the correct one.

> >  In case of a negative nsec value the result of the division must be
> >  normalized.
> 
> What effect did this problem have?  oopses?  Userspace misbehaviour? ...

Both

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
    • From: George Anzinger <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RT] don't let printk unconditionally turn on interrupts
• Next by Date: Re: RFC [patch 00/34] PID Virtualization Overview
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
• Next by thread: [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]