Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:21:40 MST, Michael Loftis said:

> And that seems where we're going with this conversation.  A fork/forks at 
> various versions to maintain bugfixes and support updates that's (more?) 
> open to submitters writing patches.  Maintained by a separate group or 
> party, but with the 'blessing' from mainline to do so.  A place for those 
> sorts of efforts to be focused, without necessarily involving the primary 
> developers.

Congrats. You just re-invented bugzilla.redhat.com.

Attachment: pgphDerLnSV3H.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• References:
  • Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Michael Loftis <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: James Courtier-Dutton <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Michael Loftis <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Michael Loftis <[email protected]>
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
    • From: Michael Loftis <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rt6: network driver disabled interrupts: skge_xmit_frame
• Next by Date: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
• Previous by thread: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
• Next by thread: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]