RE: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction

>> >personally, I think this this useful functionality, but my personal
>> >preference is that this would be in DM/LVM2 rather than MD.  but given
>> >Neil is the MD author/maintainer, I can see why he'd prefer to do it in
>> >MD. :)
>> 
>> Why don't MD and DM merge some bits?
>
>Which bits?
>Why?
>
>My current opinion is that you should:
>
> Use md for raid1, raid5, raid6 - anything with redundancy.
> Use dm for multipath, crypto, linear, LVM, snapshot

There are pairs of files that look like they would do the same thing:

  raid1.c  <-> dm-raid1.c
  linear.c <-> dm-linear.c



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction
    • From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction
    • From: "Lincoln Dale \(ltd\)" <[email protected]>
  • RE: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • RE: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 0/5] ia64 ioremap, DMI, EFI system table
• Next by Date: [PATCH 1/5] EFI, /dev/mem: simplify efi_mem_attribute_range()
• Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]