Re: [patch] kbuild: add automatic updateconfig target

Hi,

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, maximilian attems wrote:

> > What's wrong with 'yes "" | make oldconfig'?
> > If we added such a make target, it would be basically just this.
> 
> why should we add this workaround, when adding a target
> that sets the default is so easy?

What advantages would this have compared to the "workaround"?

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] kbuild: add automatic updateconfig target
    • From: maximilian attems <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] kbuild: add automatic updateconfig target
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] kbuild: add automatic updateconfig target
    • From: maximilian attems <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [git patch] Move ip2.c and ip2main.c to drivers/char/ip2/
• Next by Date: [patch 1/2] driver core: platform_get_irq*(): return -ENXIO on error
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] kbuild: add automatic updateconfig target
• Next by thread: Can't mlock hugetlb in 2.6.15
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]