Re: [patch] mm: Convert global dirty_exceeded flag to per-node node_dirty_exceeded

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 06:13:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Convert global dirty_exceeded flag to per-node node_dirty_exceeded.
> > > 
> > > dirty_exceeded ping pongs between nodes in order to force all cpus in
> > > the system to increase the frequency of calls to balance_dirty_pages.
> > > 
> > > Currently dirty_exceeded is used by balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited to
> > > force all CPUs in the system call balance_dirty_pages often, in order to
> > > reduce the amount of dirty pages in the entire system (based on
> > > dirty_thresh and one CPU exceeding thee ratelimits).  As dirty_exceeded
> > > is a global variable, it will ping-pong between nodes of a NUMA system
> > > which is not good.
> > 
> > Did you not test this obvious little optimisation?
> 
> We ran the test we encountered this problem on with your patch.
> At first it looked like it did not help.  But later we found that there was
> false sharing on this variable.

OK.  That's a bit nasty, isn't it?  It can work well or poorly for
different people depending upon vagaries of .config and the linker.

We should find out what it was sharing _with_.  Could you please run

	nm -n vmlinux| grep -C5 dirty_exceeded


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux